Archive for the 'Media' Category

On “Moon”

Moon is a film by Duncan Jones. It stars Sam Rockwell as Sam Bell, an employee of a lunar mining company that harvests helium for energy use on Earth. Sam is alone on the Moon, with no direct human contact and only his robot GERTY to keep him company. At this point, the film could have become one of three things. It could have become some sort of space opera where Sam fights Moon Men over natural resources. It could have become a cerebral, elegant, and poignant science fiction film in the vein of 2001. Or it could have become Mystery Science Theater 3000. And despite my unabashed love of MST3K, I am please to report that Moon is one of the best pure science fiction films I’ve seen in quite a while.

The film is filled with beautiful imagery, an understated and effective score, and a very naturalistic and moving performance by Sam Rockwell. But the biggest reason to recommend Moon is the way that Jones approaches the subject matter. I hate to bash on Star Wars, but the series corrupted America’s concept of science fiction. Sci-fi has became a byword for action-adventure in space, and even when brave directors have tried to break out of that formula, they haven’t met with much success. Even films like The Matrix and its various knockoffs were simply “action-adventure IN THE FUTURE” or “action-adventure WITH COMPUTERS,” rather than classical 2001-style science fiction. With few exceptions, the genre on film was for a long period of time nothing more than simple variations on action-adventure.

But science fiction isn’t defined by explosions in space. Science fiction uses advances in technology to expose truths about the human condition and the way we adapt to brave new worlds. That’s why I’m thrilled to see a film like Moon so well received. It’s a film about a future that we can easily envision. What it does, like all great sci-fi, is explore the consequences of that future. And coupled with other recent projects like Caprica (yes, I know it’s not set in the future, but you get the point), it gives sci-fi fans a little bit of hope about tomorrow’s genre projects.

There’s nothing wrong with big budget blockbusters like Star Wars. Those are really enjoyable films. But every once in a while, a Moon is a welcome relief.

How Economists Roll

The difference between Keynes and Hayek is that Keynes’s theories were primarily concerned with providing politicians cover for expanding government control of the economy, whereas Hayek’s were concerned with explaining how things work.

On the iPad

I’m not going to bother explaining what the iPad is. If you’ve been anywhere near a computer today, you’ve seen it and formed an opinion on it. My opinion, predictably, is of the OHMIGODITSTHECOOLESTTHINGEVERIHAVETOHAVEIT variety. That said, I understand that some people aren’t as enthusiastic. They ask why it’s preferable to a laptop. They say it’s essentially an oversized iPhone or iPod Touch. They question its purpose, and the purpose of tablets in general. In short, they don’t “get it.” That’s understandable, and honestly there’s nothing wrong with that. And while I’m not an expert in theories of media consumption, I have been thinking about the issues raised by the iPad and by other recent technological advances in some depth, and would like to offer my perspective.

Continue reading ‘On the iPad’

On “Stiff Upper Lip, Jeeves”

I finally decided to dive headfirst into Wodehouse – that is, Sir Pelham Grenville Wodehouse, famed British novelist and playwright. I had been recommended his work over the years, but never actually made a serious effort to read any of it. His most famous creations – bumbling playboy Bertie Wooster and his valet Jeeves – were brought to life in an acclaimed British television series starring comedy geniuses Hugh Laurie and Stephen Fry, and were also the subject of a Lovecraft-inspired short story included in Alan Moore’s The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen: The Black Dossier (which I should say is thus far my favorite installment in that particular series). Given that Wodehouse’s works had influenced the works of those three titans of British popular culture, I figured I might as well give him a chance.

Continue reading ‘On “Stiff Upper Lip, Jeeves”’

Caprica

Note: This post was originally dated July 22nd, 2009, but in light of the series’s debut last Friday, I feel obligated to repost.

I’m a big fan of Ronald D. Moore’s Battlestar Galactica, which finished its run on the channel formerly known as Sci-Fi earlier this year.  Having spent years wrapped up in the drama unfolding in Admiral Adama’s ragtag fleet and in desperate need of a quality science fiction story, I was anxious to see what Moore and company were going to do with their recently commissioned but long-gestating prequel series Caprica.  Billed as more of a political and family drama than a space story, Caprica promised to be a very different experience from its predecessor.

Continue reading ‘Caprica’

On Animal Farm

I commemorated the New Year by reading George Orwell’s Animal Farm for the first time.  I came away with mixed feelings.  I’m not generally enthusiastic about allegories, mainly because they’re usually so focused on making observations about history that they fail to present these observations in a compelling way.  By applying the narrative of the Russian Revolution, and particularly the rise of Stalinism, to a British farm, Orwell removes his readers from the realities of the Soviet Union and allows them to view the events in a dehumanized, almost more objective way.  It’s an interesting idea that has been used successfully in other tales.  But the novel ultimately left me disappointed, for two reasons. First, Orwell uses the farm to parallel the Stalinist regime, rather than symbolize it.  Second, Animal Farm reads much more as a subjective history than as an individual’s story.  As a result, readers are kept at arms distance throughout.

Continue reading ‘On Animal Farm’

But What About the Robots?


In The Know: Are We Giving The Robots That Run Our Society Too Much Power?

Watch Caprica to find out…?

The Greatest Gimmick Ever

The Onion claims to have been purchased by a Chinese company and has adjusted its content accordingly.  Having studied in China, I believe I have the authority to decree this gimmick mind-blowingly hilarious.  Check it out.


Police Still Searching For Missing Productive, Obedient Woman

Obama’s Plans to Cut Military Spending

I’ve managed to port over some more of the old Blogger posts, which are now available in the archives.  I’ll be doing more updates throughout the week.  Stay tuned!

While you’re waiting, here’s a video on President Obama’s plans to cut military spending.


Obama Axes Pentagon Plan To Build Billion Dollar Tank In Shape Of Dragon

Public Enemies

I saw Michael Mann’s Public Enemies last night, and despite my enthusiasm for the actors involved and the subject matter, I left sorely disappointed.  I have a very high tolerance for terrible films – I list Batman & Robin, Leprechaun 4: In Space, and Viva Kineval as three of my all-time favorites – but Mann’s picture was so routine, so pedestrian, so damn boring that I couldn’t even find joy in making fun of it.  The only moments that even threatened to pull me in were when two Wire alumni showed up.  They were, like all other actors in the film, wasted.

It’s sad when Johnny Depp and Christian Bale, two of the finest actors of this generation, are allowed to drift through a film.  The truth is, though, that the roles of Dillinger and Purvis were written so generically that any two actors could have played them.  There was nothing in the script designed to utilize the special talents of either Depp or Bale.  It seems that the casting department was motivated more by what might look good on a poster than by what might work well in the picture.  The supporting cast fares no better, with Academy Award-winner Marion Cotillard coming out the worst of the bunch.  The French accent she uses for the Wisconsin-born Billie Frechette is especially grating.  Only Billy Crudup’s performance as J. Edgar Hoover is worth seeing, although Mann’s script paints the complex Hoover in such broad strokes that he might as well have just animated him and been done with it.

What really kills the film for me though is its haphazard structure.  A film that moves in such strict chronological order should not be this hard to follow.  There is no story that ever really comes together though, nor does any arc for the characters ever emerge.  They just jump from scene to scene, with no one event having any real impact on the following events.  There isn’t any cohesive flow in the film, and I don’t know whether to blame that on poor writing or poor editing.  I have a sneaking suspicion that about an hour’s worth of story was left on the cutting room floor.  It’s the only way I can imagine this project ever making sense.

And there mistakes, simple mistakes that should have been spotted and corrected.  There is no reason why all the cars in Indiana should have Wisconsin license plates. There is no excuse for having a poorly CGI-ed propeller-driven plane with no propellers.  I suppose there is the remote possibility that it’s all intentional, that Mann decided to make an incredibly experimental film and dress it up as a blockbuster, but I doubt it.  The greater – and sadder – likelihood is that the production team was just plain sloppy.  This is the Windows Vista of summer blockbusters.

Poorly written, poorly edited, poorly acted, and poorly directed, Public Enemies is the most disappointing film I’ve seen in a very long time.