Archive for September, 2009

Oops

Monday, September 28th, 2009

When Barack Obama was elected the 44th President of the United States, it was because voters believed that he was the herald of a new kind of politician, one that thrived on optimism, sensibility, and competence.

Oops.

(more…)

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare via email

Divided We Stand

Monday, September 14th, 2009

This column was originally posted at The D.C. Writeup.

Wednesday night’s Very Special Episode of the Barack Obama Show has come and gone, and the most memorable thing about it was an interruption by an unruly member of the audience. The President’s Historic Game-Changing Speech is beginning to look like just another in a long line of pointless rhetorical exercises.

(more…)

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare via email

A Zero-Sum Proposition

Saturday, September 5th, 2009

Note: This column was originally posted at The D.C. Writeup.

One element of the health care debate that hasn’t received much attention is the underlying economic and philosophical misconception behind the Democrats’ proposals. While we’ve heard countless reports about the “necessity” of providing health care coverage to those who can’t afford it (or don’t want it), there’s been relatively little discussion concerning one of the central tenants not only of health care reform, but also of modern liberalism. The Left’s rush to embrace radical health care legislation and, more broadly, an economic package premised on redistribution, is the result of its unyielding but erroneous belief that capitalism is ultimately a zero-sum game. In liberals’ minds, there is a fixed amount of wealth in the world, and the acquisition of wealth by one party necessarily comes at the expense of another party.

(more…)

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare via email

Can We Have Buckley Back?

Friday, September 4th, 2009

I strongly recommend giving this article by Patrick Ruffini a read.  It makes a strong case for the rebirth of intellectual conservatism, which has fallen by the wayside in recent years as our greatest thinkers have died and not been replaced.  It’s called “Can We Have Buckley Back?

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare via email

How Many Chickens Do We Have Again?

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009
Okay, first the good news:
President Obamas Approval Rating (Source: Rassmussen Reports)

President Obama's Approval Rating (Source: Rassmussen Reports)

Now before we get into it, let’s take a moment to acknowledge why Republicans’ spirits seem to be rising lately.  It’s hard not to get excited, I’ll admit, when we see Barack Obama’s support collapsing under the weight of his own colossal sense of self-importance.  With elections coming up in just a couple of months, Republican candidates Chris Christie and Bob McDonnell seem poised to take back the New Jersey and Virginia governorships, respectively, which could have the same energizing effect on the GOP as Jon Corzine’s and Tim Kaine’s elections did on Democrats in 2005. And as of yesterday, Republicans now lead Democrats on the generic Congressional ballot by seven points, according to the latest poll release by Rassmussen Reports. After a brief period in the wilderness, Republicans are now being presented with the opportunity to assert themselves once more.  Many analysts are now predicting double-digit gains for the GOP in the 2010 Congressional elections, and some optimistic conservatives are even fantasizing about a return to the majority in the House.

Bottom line: it’s easy to get excited right now.  Things seem to be going well and momentum seems to be on our side. But brace yourself, because here comes the cold water.

Momentum in politics is unpredictable, and popularity lost can almost always be regained if the individual in question knows what he’s doing.  How many times have we seen a politician defeated, discounted, and discarded, only to triumphantly rise from the ashes and leave us in disbelief?  History is rife with examples, including Harry Truman’s electoral victory in 1948 and Richard Nixon’s stunning comeback in 1968 after six years of irrelevance.  Given Americans’ fondness for second chances in politics, it would be naive to assume that President Obama’s recent decline in popularity reflects a permanent shift in the way people view he and his policies.  Furthermore, we would be wise to remember that other first-term presidents have overcome similar trials and tribulations.

President Clintons Approval Rating

President Clinton's Approval Rating (Source: Wikipedia)

Let’s not forget that Bill Clinton spent much of his first three years as President with an approval rating below 50%.  And while his early troubles did result in the Republican takeover of Congress, the GOP did have a number of factors working in its favor that year beyond Clinton’s unpopularity, not the least of which was the rise of a new generation of Reagan-inspired politicians and the emergence of Newt Gingrich as arguably conservatism’s most powerful post-Reagan leader.  Clinton’s decline, coupled with the Republican’s readiness to lead as exemplified in the Contract With America plan, resulted in an unprecedented transfer of power from one party to the other during a midterm election.

President Reagans Approval Rating (Source: Wikipedia)

President Reagan's Approval Rating (Source: Wikipedia)

Additionally, we must remember that following the spike in public support after his shooting, President Reagan’s approval ratings declined for nearly a year and a half, bottoming out in early 1983 just before the economic turnaround kicked into high gear. Reagan’s unpopularity allowed the Democrats to increase their majority in the House of Representatives, although the Senate remained firmly in Republican hands.  Until the end of 1983, many considered Reagan a vulnerable President with little remaining political capital, and it was considered likely that a strong Democratic candidate would throw him out of office in 1984.

Both men were, of course, reelected.

The point is that Barack Obama’s current unpopularity is by no means a permanent condition.  It is still entirely possible that he will right his ship and sail to victory in 2012.  Republicans cannot take for granted that they will have an easy road to Congressional majorities and the White House.  They must instead fight with passion and vigor if they intend to truly return to power, and they must do it wisely.

But the Republican Party, as I have argued before, seems to be bereft of the Gingrich-style leader that we need to wage a successful campaign.  Furthermore, we have yet to forcefully articulate an alternative view of what path the country should be taking over the next several years.  We are running the risk of defining ourselves by opposition, and while it helps to argue against your opponents, it is equally important to be able to argue for yourself.  It is imperative that the Republican Party demonstrate to the American voters a clear alternative to Obama’s left-wing plan, or else it will be passing up an opportunity to truly knock the young President off-balance and (potentially) out of office.  Until the GOP makes the case for itself, any triumphs will be insubstantial and fleeting.

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare via email