Archive for December 31st, 2008

Beer Review: Saison Dupont & Kulmbacher Eisbock

Wednesday, December 31st, 2008

Beer number one for the evening was the Saison Dupont, a Belgian farmhouse ale with a fruity flavor and very slight bitterness that jumps out of its bottle with gusto.  A Saison is a farmhouse ale, traditionally brewed in the winter to be consumed during the summer. The Saison Dupont ranks eighteenth on the top fifty beers list from which I’ve been working recently, and although I’m not sure I’d rank it so highly, I definitely support its presence there.  As I poured it into the tall Pilsner glass, it foamed like a rabid dog, but it went down easy and left a great little aftertaste. Certainly not the best Belgian ale you can find, but if you’re looking for something a little different from the usual fare, it’s certainly worthwhile.

The second beer of the evening was number two on the list, the Kulmbacher Eisbock. The world’s first and most highly acclaimed ice beer, the Kulmbacher Eisbock was discovered by a stroke of luck when, according to beer legend, a young brewer’s apprentice accidentally left a barrel of of bock beer outside on a cold Bavarian night.  The barrel was discovered the next spring, broken open but with a rich, concentrated brew left behind. This is a big, malty beer with a deceptive scent. When I cracked the bottle, I thought it would definitely be a sipper, but I was shocked at how easily it went down. Again, I’m not sure if I’d rank it at number two on the top fifty beers of all time, but it definitely deserves to be up there. Additionally, this marks my first foray into authentic German beer, and I can’t imagine a better way to start. Zum Wohl!

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare via email

Source of Rights

Wednesday, December 31st, 2008
The more I think about it, the more I believe that the difference between conservatives and liberals is a difference in understanding the origins of the rights of man. The conservative view of the Bill of Rights is that it is designed to protect the preexisting inalienable rights of man. It was also the position of the Founding Fathers that all men are endowed “with certain unalienable Rights,” and that “among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Conservatives view rights as something that cannot be taken away from an individual, and that no matter what the ruling government says, the rights remain the same. Governments cannot eliminate rights if rights are inalienable; they can merely repress them and deny them.
Liberals on the other hand seem to believe that rather than protecting our rights, the Constitution grants them. They seem to believe that if the government were to, say, repeal the First Amendment, we would lose our right to free speech. In the same situation, conservatives would say that our right to free speech was being denied. I believe that this comes from the liberals’ dim view of humanity. They deny that we could possibly be endowed with natural rights. Because they deny natural rights, they believe that government acts as the final arbitrator of individual rights. This is why they turn to the government to solve their problems, because they believe that since the government has granted them rights, then naturally it is the only entity capable of properly overcoming humanity’s challenges.

This discrepancy in the view of the origin of rights is in my opinion the primary difference between the conservative and liberal philosophies, and continues to drive political debate around the world.

Share on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare via email